Skip to main content
Published: 2026-09-12 · Last reviewed: 2026-09-12 · Reading edit: 2026-09-12 You know why a company might need help. The next question is who understands the problem and how to approach them appropriately. Contact research helps you find that person, check the role, and prepare a relevant opening without collecting unnecessary personal details.

Start from the account question

Use this workflow after account research has established a plausible business need. Avoid collecting people simply because a database makes them available. A role hypothesis can be wrong even when the address is deliverable.

Build a minimal contact brief

  1. Identify the responsibility. Name the workflow, decision, or implementation task you need to discuss. Translate that responsibility into plausible roles without assuming titles are consistent across companies.
  2. Check current professional evidence. Use company pages, published professional profiles, event biographies, or an approved data provider. Record source and date. Distinguish a confirmed responsibility from an inference.
  3. Choose the least intrusive suitable route. Prefer the person’s published business route or another route approved for the intended use. Do not enrich with private life details or sensitive traits just to manufacture personalization.
  4. Review eligibility. Check jurisdiction, channel rules, provenance, applicable notices or permissions, and internal suppression. A publicly visible address or provider contract does not by itself establish permission for every use.
  5. Resolve ambiguity. If two people plausibly own the task, write a neutral routing question or use an appropriate company contact route. Do not pretend to have inside knowledge.
  6. Set a freshness rule. Record a review date and remove or correct stale role information. Keep only fields needed for the stated purpose and retention policy.

Worked example

A hypothetical analytics vendor wants to discuss how a retailer reconciles weekly figures. A public job description suggests finance operations owns the process; a profile says someone manages reporting, but does not confirm procurement authority. The brief marks that person as a possible workflow owner, without assuming they control the budget. The message asks whether reconciliation sits with their team and offers a relevant example. If they redirect the sender, the new contact is assessed on its own merits; check the appropriate contact route and any recorded contact restrictions again.

Contact brief

Here is a starting brief for the fictional retailer above. The uncertain fields tell the researcher what to check next.

Quality check

A second person should be able to explain why this contact is relevant without reading a flattering personalized sentence. Sample briefs for stale roles, unsupported authority claims, and missing records of where contact details came from. Measure useful routing and conversations, not merely the number of records enriched.

Try it with your own work

For one account, name the responsibility you need to discuss before searching for a title. Find current professional evidence of who owns it and record what is still uncertain.

Sources and scope

  • ICO direct marketing guidance is a UK-specific reference. Applicable requirements depend on jurisdiction, recipient, channel, and purpose; validate the intended operation before sending.
The example is fictional; any numbers illustrate the method rather than a benchmark. Adapt the worksheet to your own situation. Account research · Contact data · Cold email Chapter guide · All playbooks
Copyright © 2026 Ivan Xu. All rights reserved. See the copyright and reuse terms. Canonical source: github.com/weilun88313/B2B-Playbook